
AMD A6-3400M
CPUID : AMD A6-3400M APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics
Architecture : x86
Codename : Llano
L3 Cache : -
Clock : 1.4GHz - 2.3GHz
Core/Thread : 4/4
TDP : 35W
Technology : 32nm
Socket : PGA FS1 (905)
IGPU : AMD Radeon HD 6520G
See more specification...
Thursday, 24 November 2022 05:29 | Update at 1 month ago
Hardware Benchmark Record
This table displays the scores or sequential read & write speeds (for storage types) of various synthetic benchmark applications commonly used to test hardware performance. You can click on the score column to view the submissions page by ID. At that URL, you can browse the submitted results of each application, including viewing screenshots of the benchmark results. For screenshots of benchmark results, you can click the "View" button in the screenshot column.
In total, there are 16 submissions across 16 different benchmark applications, each testing the hardware from a unique angle. This variety allows you to draw a more comprehensive conclusion about the hardware's real-world performance.
Media Gallery
A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.
Nearby Competitors
Shows two other devices with slightly higher scores and two others with slightly lower scores on the same benchmarks. Useful to see how competitive these devices are.
Cinebench - 2003
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | 986 cb | 128.9% |
Higher | Intel Core i3 2330M | 1067 cb | 139.5% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 765 cb | 100% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 292 cb | 38.2% |
Cinebench - R11.5
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i3 2330M | 1.95 pts | 108.9% |
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 2.71 pts | 151.4% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 1.79 pts | 100% |
Lower | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | 1.61 pts | 89.9% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 0.54 pts | 30.2% |
Cinebench - R15
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i3 2330M | 163 cb | 106.5% |
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 220 cb | 143.8% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 153 cb | 100% |
Lower | Intel Celeron B815 | 104 cb | 68.0% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 44 cb | 28.8% |
Cinebench - R20
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i3 2330M | 413 pts | 141.9% |
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 527 pts | 181.1% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 291 pts | 100% |
Lower | Intel Celeron B815 | 207 pts | 71.1% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 79 pts | 27.1% |
Geekbench5 - Single Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 282 points | 131.8% |
Higher | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 384 points | 179.4% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 214 points | 100% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | 154 points | 72.0% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 | 146 marks | 68.2% |
Geekbench5 - Multi Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 | 880 marks | 118.0% |
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 917 points | 122.9% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 746 points | 100% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | 609 points | 81.6% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 255 points | 34.2% |
Geekbench4 - Single Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i7 720QM | 1420 points | 134.0% |
Higher | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G | 1831 points | 172.7% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 1060 points | 100% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 | 886 marks | 83.6% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | 827 points | 78.0% |
Geekbench4 - Multi Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | 3263 points | 104.6% |
Higher | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 | 3763 marks | 120.6% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 3119 points | 100% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6750 | 2594 marks | 83.2% |
Lower | Amlogic S905X-BV | 1791 points | 57.4% |
Geekbench3 - Single Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 | 833 marks | 103.7% |
Higher | MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 | 899 points | 112.0% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 803 points | 100% |
Lower | Amlogic S905X-BV | 652 points | 81.2% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6750 | 602 marks | 75.0% |
Geekbench3 - Multi Core
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 | 2862 points | 100.0% |
Higher | Intel Core i3 2330M | 3652 points | 127.6% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 2861 points | 100% |
Lower | MediaTek MT6750 | 1999 marks | 69.9% |
Lower | Amlogic S905X-BV | 1926 points | 67.3% |
wPrime - 32M
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 3sec, 985ms | 14.7% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1135G7 | 6sec, 334ms | 23.3% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 27sec, 142ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 1min, 8sec, 78ms | 250.8% |
Lower | Intel Celeron N2815 | 47sec, 267ms | 174.1% |
wPrime - 1024M
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 3min, 3sec, 230ms | 22.3% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1135G7 | 3min, 18sec, 987ms | 24.2% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 13min, 40sec, 939ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 36min, 6sec, 64ms | 263.9% |
SuperPi - 32M
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 6min, 38sec, 548ms | 16.1% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1135G7 | 7min, 8sec, 285ms | 17.3% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 41min, 9sec, 264ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD C-60 | 52min, 10sec, 800ms | 126.8% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 45min, 28sec, 176ms | 110.5% |
SuperPi - 1M
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i7 11700 | 6sec, 921ms | 14.7% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 7sec, 92ms | 15.1% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 46sec, 984ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD C-60 | 1min, 139ms | 128.0% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 55sec, 754ms | 118.7% |
PiFast
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i7 11700 | 12sec, 510ms | 16.8% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 13sec, 990ms | 18.8% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 1min, 14sec, 310ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD C-60 | 2min, 14sec, 820ms | 181.4% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 1min, 49sec, 900ms | 147.9% |
y-cruncher - Pi-25m
Rank | Hardware | Score | Performance Percentage |
---|---|---|---|
Higher | Intel Core i5 1335U | 1sec, 61ms | 6.0% |
Higher | Intel Core i5 1135G7 | 1sec, 343ms | 7.6% |
This Hardware | AMD A6-3400M | 17sec, 682ms | 100% |
Lower | AMD E1-1200 | 1min, 10sec, 49ms | 396.2% |
About A6-3400M
Released in mid-2011, the AMD A6-3400M is a mobile processor from the Llano family designed for the mid-range laptop segment. It has 4 cores and 4 threads with a base speed of 1.4 GHz that can increase to 2.3 GHz thanks to AMD's Turbo Core technology. Carrying a 32nm fabrication process, the A6-3400M offers good power efficiency with a TDP of 35W, making it a popular choice among conventional laptop users at the time. The main advantage of this processor lies not only in having enough cores for light multitasking, but also in the integration of an onboard GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 6520G. This GPU has 320 shader cores based on the Terascale 2 architecture, which is capable enough to run light graphics applications to older games with low resolution and graphics quality settings. The combination of CPU and GPU in one chip is designed to provide a balance between computing and graphics performance in one energy-efficient package.
In terms of performance, the A6-3400M can handle everyday computing needs such as browsing the internet, watching videos, listening to music, typing documents, and other light productivity tasks. However, in heavier usage scenarios or multitasking with many applications open at once, its performance starts to show limitations, especially when combined with a small RAM capacity such as 2GB. When compared to the same generation of Intel Core i3 processors, the A6-3400M does lag behind in single-thread performance, which is an important aspect for running modern applications that are not fully optimized for multi-core. In tests on a Lenovo Sabine B475 device with 2GB DDR3 RAM and Windows 7 operating system, the A6-3400M's performance showed that it is still quite responsive for light use, although it is no longer ideal for today's heavier workloads. Even so, the A6-3400M is still an attractive option for users who want a budget laptop with basic multimedia capabilities and a decent user experience for everyday needs.
Hardware Tested:
Device: Lenovo Sabine B475
RAM: 2GB DDR3
OS: Windows 7
Need Compare to Other Hardware?
You can compare AMD A6-3400M hardware with related hardware below
Related Hardware
Explore other Processors hardware that are related to AMD A6-3400M