Loading, please wait...

HWPure Header Banner


Hardware Image

AMD A6-3400M

CPUID : AMD A6-3400M APU with Radeon(TM) HD Graphics
Architecture : x86
Codename : Llano
L3 Cache : -
Clock : 1.4GHz - 2.3GHz
Core/Thread : 4/4
TDP : 35W
Technology : 32nm
Socket : PGA FS1 (905)
IGPU : AMD Radeon HD 6520G

See more specification...

Thursday, 24 November 2022 05:29 | Update at 1 month ago


4 Core
4 Thread
Mobile Segmen
32 nm Technology
1.4 GHz Base Clock
2.3 GHz Turbo Clock
x86 Architecture

Hardware Benchmark Record

This table displays the scores or sequential read & write speeds (for storage types) of various synthetic benchmark applications commonly used to test hardware performance. You can click on the score column to view the submissions page by ID. At that URL, you can browse the submitted results of each application, including viewing screenshots of the benchmark results. For screenshots of benchmark results, you can click the "View" button in the screenshot column.

In total, there are 16 submissions across 16 different benchmark applications, each testing the hardware from a unique angle. This variety allows you to draw a more comprehensive conclusion about the hardware's real-world performance.

No Benchmark Score HWBOT/Benchmark URL Facebook URL Screenshot
Cinebench - 2003 765 cb https://hwbot.org/submission/5129931 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid02bLzdd8Y3SR3mFfbMVFFhFqh2pmggkSDPGysk43BPh6kht9xA13VjCCejNNRZBe4Rl
Cinebench - R11.5 1.79 pts https://hwbot.org/submission/5129932 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid02bLzdd8Y3SR3mFfbMVFFhFqh2pmggkSDPGysk43BPh6kht9xA13VjCCejNNRZBe4Rl
Cinebench - R15 153 cb https://hwbot.org/submission/5129937 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid02bLzdd8Y3SR3mFfbMVFFhFqh2pmggkSDPGysk43BPh6kht9xA13VjCCejNNRZBe4Rl
Cinebench - R20 291 pts https://hwbot.org/submission/5129940 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid02bLzdd8Y3SR3mFfbMVFFhFqh2pmggkSDPGysk43BPh6kht9xA13VjCCejNNRZBe4Rl
Geekbench3 - Multi Core 2861 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130055 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
Geekbench3 - Single Core 803 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130056 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
Geekbench4 - Multi Core 3119 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130058 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
Geekbench4 - Single Core 1060 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130059 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
Geekbench5 - Multi Core 746 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130060 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
Geekbench5 - Single Core 214 points https://hwbot.org/submission/5130061 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0bFs2yJEzv5reEUHFQxW5q5urZ6uWm2vrFhQcsHvBJb2aBiF3bdoVmN7kXUpqqDkil
PiFast 1min, 14sec, 310ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130054 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl
SuperPi - 1M 46sec, 984ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130047 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl
SuperPi - 32M 41min, 9sec, 264ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130048 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl
wPrime - 32M 27sec, 142ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130043 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl
wPrime - 1024M 13min, 40sec, 939ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130042 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl
y-cruncher - Pi-25m 17sec, 682ms https://hwbot.org/submission/5130045 https://www.facebook.com/hakimnu.id/posts/pfbid0CgDXFNjsb1quXHsAHjiqWSzteq222HFHgkHxV7bnho1cZiUVCa8aGMyAaw6en6nsl

Media Gallery

A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.


Nearby Competitors

Shows two other devices with slightly higher scores and two others with slightly lower scores on the same benchmarks. Useful to see how competitive these devices are.

Cinebench - 2003
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 986 cb 128.9%
Higher Intel Core i3 2330M 1067 cb 139.5%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 765 cb 100%
Lower AMD E1-1200 292 cb 38.2%
Cinebench - R11.5
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i3 2330M 1.95 pts 108.9%
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 2.71 pts 151.4%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 1.79 pts 100%
Lower Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 1.61 pts 89.9%
Lower AMD E1-1200 0.54 pts 30.2%
Cinebench - R15
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i3 2330M 163 cb 106.5%
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 220 cb 143.8%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 153 cb 100%
Lower Intel Celeron B815 104 cb 68.0%
Lower AMD E1-1200 44 cb 28.8%
Cinebench - R20
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i3 2330M 413 pts 141.9%
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 527 pts 181.1%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 291 pts 100%
Lower Intel Celeron B815 207 pts 71.1%
Lower AMD E1-1200 79 pts 27.1%
Geekbench5 - Single Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 282 points 131.8%
Higher Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G 384 points 179.4%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 214 points 100%
Lower MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 154 points 72.0%
Lower MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 146 marks 68.2%
Geekbench5 - Multi Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 880 marks 118.0%
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 917 points 122.9%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 746 points 100%
Lower MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 609 points 81.6%
Lower AMD E1-1200 255 points 34.2%
Geekbench4 - Single Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i7 720QM 1420 points 134.0%
Higher Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G 1831 points 172.7%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 1060 points 100%
Lower MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 886 marks 83.6%
Lower MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 827 points 78.0%
Geekbench4 - Multi Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 3263 points 104.6%
Higher MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 3763 marks 120.6%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 3119 points 100%
Lower MediaTek MT6750 2594 marks 83.2%
Lower Amlogic S905X-BV 1791 points 57.4%
Geekbench3 - Single Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 833 marks 103.7%
Higher MediaTek MT6762 Helio P22 899 points 112.0%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 803 points 100%
Lower Amlogic S905X-BV 652 points 81.2%
Lower MediaTek MT6750 602 marks 75.0%
Geekbench3 - Multi Core
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core 2 Duo E7500 2862 points 100.0%
Higher Intel Core i3 2330M 3652 points 127.6%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 2861 points 100%
Lower MediaTek MT6750 1999 marks 69.9%
Lower Amlogic S905X-BV 1926 points 67.3%
wPrime - 32M
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 3sec, 985ms 14.7%
Higher Intel Core i5 1135G7 6sec, 334ms 23.3%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 27sec, 142ms 100%
Lower AMD E1-1200 1min, 8sec, 78ms 250.8%
Lower Intel Celeron N2815 47sec, 267ms 174.1%
wPrime - 1024M
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 3min, 3sec, 230ms 22.3%
Higher Intel Core i5 1135G7 3min, 18sec, 987ms 24.2%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 13min, 40sec, 939ms 100%
Lower AMD E1-1200 36min, 6sec, 64ms 263.9%
SuperPi - 32M
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 6min, 38sec, 548ms 16.1%
Higher Intel Core i5 1135G7 7min, 8sec, 285ms 17.3%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 41min, 9sec, 264ms 100%
Lower AMD C-60 52min, 10sec, 800ms 126.8%
Lower AMD E1-1200 45min, 28sec, 176ms 110.5%
SuperPi - 1M
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i7 11700 6sec, 921ms 14.7%
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 7sec, 92ms 15.1%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 46sec, 984ms 100%
Lower AMD C-60 1min, 139ms 128.0%
Lower AMD E1-1200 55sec, 754ms 118.7%
PiFast
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i7 11700 12sec, 510ms 16.8%
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 13sec, 990ms 18.8%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 1min, 14sec, 310ms 100%
Lower AMD C-60 2min, 14sec, 820ms 181.4%
Lower AMD E1-1200 1min, 49sec, 900ms 147.9%
y-cruncher - Pi-25m
Rank Hardware Score Performance Percentage
Higher Intel Core i5 1335U 1sec, 61ms 6.0%
Higher Intel Core i5 1135G7 1sec, 343ms 7.6%
This Hardware AMD A6-3400M 17sec, 682ms 100%
Lower AMD E1-1200 1min, 10sec, 49ms 396.2%

About A6-3400M

Released in mid-2011, the AMD A6-3400M is a mobile processor from the Llano family designed for the mid-range laptop segment. It has 4 cores and 4 threads with a base speed of 1.4 GHz that can increase to 2.3 GHz thanks to AMD's Turbo Core technology. Carrying a 32nm fabrication process, the A6-3400M offers good power efficiency with a TDP of 35W, making it a popular choice among conventional laptop users at the time. The main advantage of this processor lies not only in having enough cores for light multitasking, but also in the integration of an onboard GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 6520G. This GPU has 320 shader cores based on the Terascale 2 architecture, which is capable enough to run light graphics applications to older games with low resolution and graphics quality settings. The combination of CPU and GPU in one chip is designed to provide a balance between computing and graphics performance in one energy-efficient package.

In terms of performance, the A6-3400M can handle everyday computing needs such as browsing the internet, watching videos, listening to music, typing documents, and other light productivity tasks. However, in heavier usage scenarios or multitasking with many applications open at once, its performance starts to show limitations, especially when combined with a small RAM capacity such as 2GB. When compared to the same generation of Intel Core i3 processors, the A6-3400M does lag behind in single-thread performance, which is an important aspect for running modern applications that are not fully optimized for multi-core. In tests on a Lenovo Sabine B475 device with 2GB DDR3 RAM and Windows 7 operating system, the A6-3400M's performance showed that it is still quite responsive for light use, although it is no longer ideal for today's heavier workloads. Even so, the A6-3400M is still an attractive option for users who want a budget laptop with basic multimedia capabilities and a decent user experience for everyday needs.

Hardware Tested:

Device: Lenovo Sabine B475
RAM: 2GB DDR3
OS: Windows 7


Need Compare to Other Hardware?

You can compare AMD A6-3400M hardware with related hardware below


Related Hardware

Explore other Processors hardware that are related to AMD A6-3400M