Loading...

Image


Comparing: AMD E1-1200 vs Intel Celeron N2815

In this comparison, we analyze two Processors: AMD E1-1200 and Intel Celeron N2815, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

Hardware Image
AMD E1-1200
Type:Processors
Brand:AMD
Model:E1-1200
See benchmark from E1-1200
Hardware Image
Intel Celeron N2815
Type:Processors
Brand:Intel
Model:Celeron N2815
See benchmark from Celeron N2815

Specification Comparison Table

This specification comparison presents technical details of several devices or components to help you understand the key differences between each option. Use this table as a reference to determine which device best suits your needs.

Specification AMD E1-1200 Intel Celeron N2815
Architecture x86 x86
Technology 40 nm 22 nm
Clock 1.4 GHz - - 1.86 GHz - 2.13 GHz
Core/Thread 2 / 2 2 / 2
Segmen Mobile Mobile

Submission Comparison Table

This submission comparison table displays the number and details of benchmark data submissions from various devices or components. This information helps you understand the performance based on the benchmarks that have been tested, as well as providing an overview of the consistency and popularity of the available benchmark results.

No. Benchmark Software AMD E1-1200 Intel Celeron N2815
1 PiFast

1min, 49sec, 900ms

1min, 28sec, 750ms

2 SuperPi - 1M

55sec, 754ms

40sec, 513ms

3 wPrime - 32M

1min, 8sec, 78ms

47sec, 267ms


Submission Comparison Chart

This chart visualizes the benchmark scores comparison between two hardware devices based on submitted data.


Media Gallery

A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.


About Hardware AMD E1-1200

Released in 2012 as part of the Brazos 2.0 family, the AMD E1-1200 is a power-efficient processor aimed at entry-level laptops. It has a 2 core and 2 thread configuration with a fixed clock speed of 1.4 GHz, with no support for Turbo Core technology. Built with a 40nm fabrication process, the E1-1200 has a TDP value of 18 watts-efficient enough for portable devices that emphasize low power consumption and longer battery life. Despite its limited performance, the E1-1200 was a popular choice in its day thanks to its affordable price and ability to handle light computing needs.

One of the main advantages of the AMD E1-1200 is the integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU, which offers better graphics performance than Intel's entry-level graphics solutions at the time. This GPU has the ability to play HD resolution videos smoothly, as well as run light games such as Counter Strike 1.6, Plants vs Zombies, or other casual games with minimum graphics settings. That said, this combination of CPU and GPU is not intended for heavy-duty work such as video editing, 3D rendering, or modern gaming. Overall performance is more optimal when used for tasks such as browsing, streaming videos, accessing social media, typing documents, as well as basic office applications.

However, it should be noted that the AMD E1-1200 is less suitable for heavy multitasking, especially in modern operating systems like Windows 10. With a low clock speed and no Boost feature, users may experience lag or limitations when opening multiple applications at once. In tests using the HP 1000 1b05au laptop, this processor was paired with 4GB DDR3 single channel RAM (2 DIMM slots) and tested on Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 10 operating systems. The results show that the most optimal performance is achieved on Windows 7 or Windows 8, while in Windows 10 the system tends to be slow although it can still be used for basic needs. As such, the AMD E1-1200 can still be relied upon as a power-efficient and inexpensive solution for users with very light computing needs.

Hardware Detail:

Device: HP 1000 1b05au
RAM: 4GB DDR3 Single Channel 2 DIMM
OS: Windows 7, Windows 8,  Windows 10 

Wednesday, 26 December 2012 14:27:36 | Update: 4 days ago


About Hardware Intel Celeron N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power-efficient processor released in 2013 as part of the Bay Trail-M family, aimed at entry-level laptops and lightweight computing devices. It has 2 cores and 2 threads with a base speed of 1.86 GHz that can increase to 2.13 GHz thanks to Intel Burst Performance technology. Built using a 22nm fabrication process, the N2815 comes with a TDP of only 7.5 watts, making it one of Intel's most efficient processors in terms of power consumption for the low-end class. This makes it very suitable for portable devices such as netbooks or mini laptops that prioritize battery life over high performance.

On the graphics side, the Intel Celeron N2815 is equipped with an integrated Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) GPU that runs at a base frequency of 313 MHz and can reach up to 756 MHz under certain conditions. This GPU is capable enough to run desktop displays smoothly, and supports 720p video playback. However, for heavy graphics tasks such as playing modern 3D games, video editing, or graphic design, this GPU is clearly not capable. Its use is more suitable for everyday computing such as opening documents, browsing the internet, playing standard videos, and running light office applications.

In terms of overall performance, the Celeron N2815 is sufficient for running light operating systems such as Windows 7 or light-based Linux distributions such as Lubuntu or Linux Mint XFCE. However, due to its simple architecture and low single-threaded performance, users may experience limitations when running multiple applications at once or when opening software that requires higher computing power. In tests using an Asus X200MA laptop with 2GB DDR3 dual channel RAM and Windows 7 operating system, performance was good enough for basic use, although it was slow when running modern applications or multitasking.

Overall, the Intel Celeron N2815 is a decent processor for light computing needs with low power consumption and an economical price, but it is not recommended for heavy productivity tasks or long-term use on modern operating systems.

Hardware Detail:

Device: Asus X200MA
RAM: 2GB Dual Channel
OS: Windows 7

Saturday, 07 May 2022 13:02:41 | Update: 4 days ago