Loading, please wait...

HWPure Header Banner


Comparing: AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Core i3 2330M

In this comparison, we analyze two Processors: AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core i3 2330M, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

Hardware Image
AMD A6-3400M
Type:Processors
Brand:AMD
Model:A6-3400M
See benchmark from A6-3400M
Hardware Image
Intel Core i3 2330M
Type:Processors
Brand:Intel
Model:i3-2330M
See benchmark from i3-2330M

Specification Comparison Table

This specification comparison presents technical details of several devices or components to help you understand the key differences between each option. Use this table as a reference to determine which device best suits your needs.

Specification AMD A6-3400M Intel Core i3 2330M
Architecture x86 x86
Technology 32 nm 32 nm
Clock 1.4 GHz - 2.3 GHz 2.2 GHz - -
Core/Thread 4 / 4 2 / 4
Segmen Mobile Mobile

Submission Comparison Table

This submission comparison table displays the number and details of benchmark data submissions from various devices or components. This information helps you understand the performance based on the benchmarks that have been tested, as well as providing an overview of the consistency and popularity of the available benchmark results.

No. Benchmark Software AMD A6-3400M Intel Core i3 2330M
1 Cinebench - 2003

765 cb

1067 cb

2 Cinebench - R11.5

1.79 pts

1.95 pts

3 Cinebench - R15

153 cb

163 cb

4 Cinebench - R20

291 pts

413 pts

5 Geekbench3 - Multi Core

2861 points

3652 points

6 Geekbench3 - Single Core

803 points

1718 points

7 Geekbench4 - Multi Core

3119 points

4322 points

8 Geekbench4 - Single Core

1060 points

2239 points

9 Geekbench5 - Multi Core

746 points

936 points

10 Geekbench5 - Single Core

214 points

410 points

11 PiFast

1min, 14sec, 310ms

34sec, 710ms

12 SuperPi - 1M

46sec, 984ms

18sec, 143ms

13 SuperPi - 32M

41min, 9sec, 264ms

16min, 54sec, 925ms

14 wPrime - 32M

27sec, 142ms

23sec, 73ms

15 wPrime - 1024M

13min, 40sec, 939ms

11min, 51sec, 960ms


Submission Comparison Chart

This chart visualizes the benchmark scores comparison between two hardware devices based on submitted data.


Media Gallery

A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.


About Hardware AMD A6-3400M

Released in mid-2011, the AMD A6-3400M is a mobile processor from the Llano family designed for the mid-range laptop segment. It has 4 cores and 4 threads with a base speed of 1.4 GHz that can increase to 2.3 GHz thanks to AMD's Turbo Core technology. Carrying a 32nm fabrication process, the A6-3400M offers good power efficiency with a TDP of 35W, making it a popular choice among conventional laptop users at the time. The main advantage of this processor lies not only in having enough cores for light multitasking, but also in the integration of an onboard GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 6520G. This GPU has 320 shader cores based on the Terascale 2 architecture, which is capable enough to run light graphics applications to older games with low resolution and graphics quality settings. The combination of CPU and GPU in one chip is designed to provide a balance between computing and graphics performance in one energy-efficient package.

In terms of performance, the A6-3400M can handle everyday computing needs such as browsing the internet, watching videos, listening to music, typing documents, and other light productivity tasks. However, in heavier usage scenarios or multitasking with many applications open at once, its performance starts to show limitations, especially when combined with a small RAM capacity such as 2GB. When compared to the same generation of Intel Core i3 processors, the A6-3400M does lag behind in single-thread performance, which is an important aspect for running modern applications that are not fully optimized for multi-core. In tests on a Lenovo Sabine B475 device with 2GB DDR3 RAM and Windows 7 operating system, the A6-3400M's performance showed that it is still quite responsive for light use, although it is no longer ideal for today's heavier workloads. Even so, the A6-3400M is still an attractive option for users who want a budget laptop with basic multimedia capabilities and a decent user experience for everyday needs.

Hardware Tested:

Device: Lenovo Sabine B475
RAM: 2GB DDR3
OS: Windows 7

Thursday, 24 November 2022 05:29:20 | Update: 1 month ago


About Hardware Intel Core i3 2330M

The Intel Core i3-2330M is a dual-core mobile processor launched in 2011 as part of Intel’s second-generation Sandy Bridge lineup. Designed for mid-range laptops, this processor features 2 cores and 4 threads thanks to Intel Hyper-Threading Technology, allowing it to handle light to moderate multitasking workloads efficiently. Operating at a fixed clock speed of 2.2 GHz and built on the 32nm process, the i3-2330M does not include Intel Turbo Boost, which limits its ability to dynamically increase performance under heavier loads, but it remains a solid choice for everyday use.

With a TDP of 35W, the i3-2330M balances power consumption and performance reasonably well for its era. It integrates Intel HD Graphics 3000, a GPU with a base clock of 650 MHz and a dynamic frequency up to 1.1 GHz. While not designed for modern gaming or demanding graphic applications, this integrated GPU handles HD video playback, basic 3D rendering, and older or lightweight games at low settings with relative ease. Users looking for casual computing and multimedia playback will find it sufficient.

In real-world usage, the Core i3-2330M performs well for standard computing tasks such as web browsing, streaming, office productivity (e.g., Word, Excel), and simple photo editing. Its Hyper-Threading capabilities give it a performance edge over older dual-core processors that lack thread duplication. However, the lack of Turbo Boost and a relatively low base frequency mean that it can struggle under CPU-intensive workloads like video rendering or large spreadsheet processing, especially when compared to more modern CPUs.

This specific configuration was tested on a SAMSUNG 300E4Z, a laptop originally shipped with an Intel Celeron B815 processor but later upgraded to the i3-2330M for better performance. With 4GB of DDR3 dual-channel memory and Windows 7 installed, the system runs smoothly for basic daily use, making the i3-2330M a practical upgrade option for budget-conscious users seeking improved performance without replacing their entire system.

Hardware Detail:

Device: SAMSUNG 300E4Z (This device originally used Celeron B815 which was upgraded to i3 2330M.)
RAM: 4GB DDR3 Dual Channel
OS: Windows 7

Friday, 05 February 2021 15:48:13 | Update: 1 month ago