Comparing: AMD E1-1200 vs MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35
In this comparison, we analyze two Processors: AMD E1-1200 and MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.

MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35
Type: | Processors |
---|---|
Brand: | MediaTek |
Model: | MediaTek MT6765 |
Specification Comparison Table
This specification comparison presents technical details of several devices or components to help you understand the key differences between each option. Use this table as a reference to determine which device best suits your needs.
Specification | AMD E1-1200 | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 |
---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | ARM |
Technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Clock | 1.4 GHz - - | 1.8 GHz - 2.3 GHz |
Core/Thread | 2 / 2 | 8 / 8 |
Segmen | Mobile | Mobile |
Submission Comparison Table
This submission comparison table displays the number and details of benchmark data submissions from various devices or components. This information helps you understand the performance based on the benchmarks that have been tested, as well as providing an overview of the consistency and popularity of the available benchmark results.
No. | Benchmark Software | AMD E1-1200 | MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Geekbench3 - Multi Core |
1050 points |
3836 marks |
2 | Geekbench3 - Single Core |
575 points |
833 marks |
3 | Geekbench4 - Multi Core |
1240 points |
3763 marks |
4 | Geekbench4 - Single Core |
737 points |
886 marks |
5 | Geekbench5 - Multi Core |
255 points |
880 marks |
6 | Geekbench5 - Single Core |
132 points |
146 marks |
7 | Geekbench6 - Multi Core |
193 points |
793 marks |
8 | Geekbench6 - Single Core |
107 points |
179 marks |
9 | PassMark - PerformanceTest (CPU Mark) |
473 marks |
3742 marks |
Submission Comparison Chart
This chart visualizes the benchmark scores comparison between two hardware devices based on submitted data.
Media Gallery
A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.
About Hardware AMD E1-1200
Released in 2012 as part of the Brazos 2.0 family, the AMD E1-1200 is a power-efficient processor aimed at entry-level laptops. It has a 2 core and 2 thread configuration with a fixed clock speed of 1.4 GHz, with no support for Turbo Core technology. Built with a 40nm fabrication process, the E1-1200 has a TDP value of 18 watts-efficient enough for portable devices that emphasize low power consumption and longer battery life. Despite its limited performance, the E1-1200 was a popular choice in its day thanks to its affordable price and ability to handle light computing needs.
One of the main advantages of the AMD E1-1200 is the integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU, which offers better graphics performance than Intel's entry-level graphics solutions at the time. This GPU has the ability to play HD resolution videos smoothly, as well as run light games such as Counter Strike 1.6, Plants vs Zombies, or other casual games with minimum graphics settings. That said, this combination of CPU and GPU is not intended for heavy-duty work such as video editing, 3D rendering, or modern gaming. Overall performance is more optimal when used for tasks such as browsing, streaming videos, accessing social media, typing documents, as well as basic office applications.
However, it should be noted that the AMD E1-1200 is less suitable for heavy multitasking, especially in modern operating systems like Windows 10. With a low clock speed and no Boost feature, users may experience lag or limitations when opening multiple applications at once. In tests using the HP 1000 1b05au laptop, this processor was paired with 4GB DDR3 single channel RAM (2 DIMM slots) and tested on Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 10 operating systems. The results show that the most optimal performance is achieved on Windows 7 or Windows 8, while in Windows 10 the system tends to be slow although it can still be used for basic needs. As such, the AMD E1-1200 can still be relied upon as a power-efficient and inexpensive solution for users with very light computing needs.
Hardware Detail:
Device: HP 1000 1b05au
RAM: 4GB DDR3 Single Channel 2 DIMM
OS: Windows 7, Windows 8, Windows 10
Wednesday, 26 December 2012 14:27:36 | Update: 4 days ago
About Hardware MediaTek MT6765 Helio P35
The MediaTek Helio P35 (MT6765) is a mid-range mobile processor introduced in 2018, designed to offer a balance between performance, efficiency, and affordability. It features eight ARM Cortex-A53 cores, all running at speeds of up to 2.3 GHz, allowing for decent multitasking and responsiveness in everyday applications.
Built using the more efficient 12nm fabrication process, the Helio P35 is a significant improvement over older chips like the MT6750 or MT6737, both in terms of power consumption and thermal performance. This makes it well-suited for entry-level and mid-range smartphones with tighter thermal and battery constraints.
For graphics, the SoC integrates the PowerVR GE8320 GPU, which supports Full HD+ displays and provides enough power for media consumption and light gaming. It also includes support for AI-enhanced features, such as image processing and face detection, though without a dedicated NPU, the AI performance is modest compared to higher-tier chipsets.
While the Helio P35 is not intended for high-performance gaming, it performs well for tasks like social media, video playback, camera use, and general app usage. However, more demanding 3D games will run only at low graphics settings with occasional frame drops.
Hardware Detail:
Devices: OPPO A5s & OPPO A15s.
Device Specifications: MediaTek MT6765, 3/32 (A5s), 4/64 (A15s), Android 8 (A5s), Android 10 (A15s).
Room Temperature: 30°C based on DHT11 Sensor.
* Note: The OPPO A15s was used in some tests due to compatibility issues with Android 8 on A5s in certain applications.
Sunday, 08 September 2019 11:02:46 | Update: 4 days ago