Comparing: AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Core i9 11900F
In this comparison, we analyze two Processors: AMD A6-3400M and Intel Core i9 11900F, using synthetic benchmark tests to evaluate their overall performance. This side-by-side comparison helps users understand which hardware delivers better value, speed, and efficiency based on standardized testing. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading an existing one, this benchmark-driven evaluation offers valuable insights to guide your decision.
Specification Comparison Table
This specification comparison presents technical details of several devices or components to help you understand the key differences between each option. Use this table as a reference to determine which device best suits your needs.
| Specification | AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core i9 11900F |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 |
| Technology | 32 nm | 14 nm |
| Clock | 1.4 GHz - 2.3 GHz | 2.5 GHz - 5.2 GHz |
| Core/Thread | 4 / 4 | 8 / 16 |
| Segmen | Mobile | Desktop |
Submission Comparison Table
This submission comparison table displays the number and details of benchmark data submissions from various devices or components. This information helps you understand the performance based on the benchmarks that have been tested, as well as providing an overview of the consistency and popularity of the available benchmark results.
| No. | Benchmark Software | AMD A6-3400M | Intel Core i9 11900F |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cinebench - R15 |
153 cb |
2034 cb |
Submission Comparison Chart
This chart visualizes the benchmark scores comparison between two hardware devices based on submitted data.
Media Gallery
A collection of photos of tested hardware. These images can help you identify the physical form, model, and variant of the hardware in question. These photos are from our own documentation, and if they are not available we may not be able to document them.
About Hardware AMD A6-3400M
Released in mid-2011, the AMD A6-3400M is a mobile processor from the Llano family designed for the mid-range laptop segment. It has 4 cores and 4 threads with a base speed of 1.4 GHz that can increase to 2.3 GHz thanks to AMD's Turbo Core technology. Carrying a 32nm fabrication process, the A6-3400M offers good power efficiency with a TDP of 35W, making it a popular choice among conventional laptop users at the time. The main advantage of this processor lies not only in having enough cores for light multitasking, but also in the integration of an onboard GPU, the AMD Radeon HD 6520G. This GPU has 320 shader cores based on the Terascale 2 architecture, which is capable enough to run light graphics applications to older games with low resolution and graphics quality settings. The combination of CPU and GPU in one chip is designed to provide a balance between computing and graphics performance in one energy-efficient package.
In terms of performance, the A6-3400M can handle everyday computing needs such as browsing the internet, watching videos, listening to music, typing documents, and other light productivity tasks. However, in heavier usage scenarios or multitasking with many applications open at once, its performance starts to show limitations, especially when combined with a small RAM capacity such as 2GB. When compared to the same generation of Intel Core i3 processors, the A6-3400M does lag behind in single-thread performance, which is an important aspect for running modern applications that are not fully optimized for multi-core. In tests on a Lenovo Sabine B475 device with 2GB DDR3 RAM and Windows 7 operating system, the A6-3400M's performance showed that it is still quite responsive for light use, although it is no longer ideal for today's heavier workloads. Even so, the A6-3400M is still an attractive option for users who want a budget laptop with basic multimedia capabilities and a decent user experience for everyday needs.
Hardware Tested:
Device: Lenovo Sabine B475
RAM: 2GB DDR3
OS: Windows 7
Thursday, 24 November 2022 05:29:20 | Update: 4 days ago
About Hardware Intel Core i9 11900F
The Intel Core i9-11900F, launched in 2021, is a high-end desktop processor from the 11th generation Rocket Lake family. Featuring 8 cores and 16 threads, this CPU is built for users who demand strong single-core performance in tasks such as gaming, creative workloads, and professional applications. With a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz and a boost clock up to 5.2 GHz via Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0, the i9-11900F delivers fast responsiveness and excellent performance in lightly threaded scenarios.
Manufactured on the 14nm process, the i9-11900F introduces architectural improvements over its predecessor, including a significant IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) gain, thanks to the new Cypress Cove core design. However, despite these gains, the reliance on the older 14nm node leads to higher power consumption and lower efficiency compared to AMD’s Ryzen 5000 series built on 7nm technology—especially in sustained multi-threaded workloads.
As an “F” series processor, the i9-11900F lacks integrated graphics, meaning it requires a dedicated GPU to operate. This makes it a better fit for gaming PCs or professional workstations that already include a discrete graphics card. While this may not be ideal for users seeking basic systems without a GPU, it allows Intel to price the CPU more competitively.
In benchmarks and real-world performance tests, the Core i9-11900F excels in gaming, offering frame rates comparable to top-tier CPUs when paired with a modern graphics card. It also performs well in productivity tasks such as photo editing, software development, and video rendering—though users working with highly threaded applications might benefit more from CPUs with higher core counts.
Overall, the Intel Core i9-11900F is a solid choice for enthusiast builders, gamers, and users looking for top-tier single-core performance, but it may not be the most efficient option for heavy multitasking or rendering workloads when compared to newer multi-core CPUs.
Monday, 20 June 2022 07:37:04 | Update: 4 days ago